In Mac, Studio Window Not Show

Dear Cuba Platform’s team,
I would like to try Cuba Platform for my first time. It seems like this platform is promising.

My system is:
OS: OSX 10.9.2
Java: 10.0.1
JAVA_HOME: /Library/Java/Home

However, the IDE is not showing. And I got log in ~/.haulmont/studio/logs/studio.log like below:

2018-05-28 08:10:02,480 INFO  [com.haulmont.studio.server.StudioServerManager] CUBA Studio v.6.8.6 built on 2018-05-22 13:08:44
2018-05-28 08:10:03,042 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader
2018-05-28 08:10:03,169 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader
2018-05-28 08:10:48,853 INFO  [com.haulmont.studio.server.StudioServerManager] CUBA Studio v.6.8.6 built on 2018-05-22 13:08:44
2018-05-28 08:10:49,219 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader
2018-05-28 08:10:49,314 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader
2018-05-28 08:19:34,453 INFO  [com.haulmont.studio.server.StudioServerManager] CUBA Studio v.6.8.6 built on 2018-05-22 13:08:44
2018-05-28 08:19:34,971 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader
2018-05-28 08:19:35,114 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader
2018-05-28 08:22:45,672 INFO  [com.haulmont.studio.server.StudioServerManager] CUBA Studio v.6.8.6 built on 2018-05-22 13:08:44
2018-05-28 08:22:46,061 INFO  [org.atmosphere.util.IOUtils] META-INF/services/org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework not found in class loader

Need your support to resolve this issue please.

Use JAVA 8 DK :slight_smile:

I haven’t see that as reasonable suggestion.

Someone told me that Cuba Platform currently only support Java 8.
Mine is 10. So, that’s why.

Well, maybe I will try to find another solution then.
Thanks for the response @Earl02.